• Ophthalmology · Aug 2004

    Prevalence of ocular diagnoses found on screening 1539 adults with intellectual disabilities.

    • Jacques van Splunder, Jan S Stilma, Roos M D Bernsen, and Heleen M Evenhuis.
    • Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
    • Ophthalmology. 2004 Aug 1; 111 (8): 1457-63.

    ObjectiveTo study the prevalence of ocular disorders in adults with intellectual disabilities (IDs) in the Netherlands.DesignCross-sectional survey.SubjectsA stratified random sample (for age more than 50 years and Down syndrome [DS]) of 1598 participants drawn from a base population of 9012 adult users of ID services with mild to profound intellectual disabilities in the Netherlands.MethodsParticipants underwent on-site visual screening on the basis of a protocol. Results were related to degree of ID, occurrence of DS, age, and a diagnosis of visual impairment or blindness. Referral to ophthalmologists followed when visual impairment was diagnosed.Main Outcome MeasuresDiagnosis of ocular disorders and their prevalence.ResultsRefractive errors were most prevalent (60.6%), followed by strabismus (44.1%) and lens opacities (18.1%). Besides these, in participants diagnosed as visually impaired, cerebral visual impairment was the most common untreatable disorder (12.6%), followed by macular degeneration (5.4%). Compared with known figures from general populations, the prevalence of ocular diagnoses in adults with ID was significantly higher. The occurrence of refractive errors and strabismus was significantly related to DS (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 3.00; and OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.93 to 3.17, respectively). Lens opacities had an independent relation with age more than 50 years (OR, 4.23; 95% CI, 3.04 to 5.88) and DS (OR, 8.27; 95% CI, 5.95 to 11.49). Keratoconus was independently related to DS (OR, 7.65; 95% CI, 3.91 to 14.96) and degree of ID (OR, 5.56; 95% CI, 2.79 to 11.06). Corneal opacities also were related to DS (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.41 to 5.18) and degree of ID (OR, 5.53; 95% CI, 2.66 to 11.48). The risk of ocular hypertension was increased by age more than 50 years (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.16 to 5.57) and severe or profound ID (OR, 4.86; 95% CI, 2.06 to 10.63); DS decreased the risk (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.94).ConclusionsIn 1539 adults with ID in the Netherlands, high prevalences of ocular disorders were found. Adults with ID in general have an increased risk of severe myopia, strabismus, and lens opacities; DS, older age, or severe ID further increase the risk of specific ocular disorders.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.