• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Oct 2013

    Review Meta Analysis

    Is general anaesthesia for caesarean section associated with postpartum haemorrhage? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Although general anaesthesia was associated with greater blood loss than regional anaesthesia in this meta-analysis (only ~100 mL), this is of questionable significance, and meta-analysis of RCTs showed there was no greater risk of blood transfusion.

    summary
    • Michael Heesen, Thomas Hofmann, Sven Klöhr, Rolf Rossaint, Marc van de Velde, Jan Deprest, and Sebastian Straube.
    • Department of Anaesthesia, Klinikum Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.
    • Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Oct 1;57(9):1092-102.

    BackgroundPostpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. The odds for PPH were about eight times higher following general anaesthesia compared with neuraxial anaesthesia in a recent retrospective study. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of type of anaesthesia (general vs. neuraxial) on estimated blood loss and transfusion requirements after caesarean section.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed. The quality of eligible reports was assessed using the Oxford Quality Scale. Data were subjected to meta-analysis using the random effects model.ResultsThe search identified 18 articles including 12,330 parturients. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) found a significant difference in blood loss, favouring neuraxial anaesthesia (spinal and epidural) when comparing with general anaesthesia {weighted mean difference -106.11 ml [95% confidence interval (CI) -209.80, -2.42 ml], P = 0.04}. In further analyses, we found a significant difference after epidural compared with general anaesthesia but not after spinal compared with general anaesthesia. Based on RCTs, there was no significantly increased risk of blood transfusions with general anaesthesia. Analysis of non-randomised studies found a significantly higher transfusion requirement after general anaesthesia (risk ratio 5.06, 95% CI 2.47-10.36, P < 0.00001). The incidence of hypotension and the amount of fluid given were higher in the neuraxial anaesthesia groups.ConclusionGeneral anaesthesia is associated with a higher blood loss than neuraxial anaesthesia. However, based on high-quality studies, the need for blood transfusion was not greater. The higher blood loss with general anaesthesia is therefore of uncertain clinical relevance.© 2013 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    summary
    1

    Although general anaesthesia was associated with greater blood loss than regional anaesthesia in this meta-analysis (only ~100 mL), this is of questionable significance, and meta-analysis of RCTs showed there was no greater risk of blood transfusion.

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley
     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.