• Florent Thézard, Neil McDonald, Dean Kriellaars, Gordon Giesbrecht, Erin Weldon, and Rob T Pryce.
• Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Nov 1; 23 (6): 811-819.

AbstractObjective: To determine the influence of ambulance motion on head-neck (H-N) kinematics and to compare the effectiveness of two spinal precaution (SP) protocols: spinal immobilization (SI) and spinal motion reduction (SMR). Methods: Eighteen healthy volunteers (7 females) underwent a series of standardized ambulance transport tasks, across various speeds, under the two SP protocols in a balanced order (n = 12 drivers, n = 7 ambulances). Inertial measurement units were placed on participants' heads and sternums, with another affixed to the stretcher mattress frame. Outcome measures included H-N displacement and acceleration. Results: Ambulance accelerations varied across driving tasks (2.5-9.5 m/s2) and speeds (3.0-6.2 m/s2) and resulted in a wide range of H-N displacements (7.2-22.6 deg) and H-N accelerations (1.4-10.9 m/s2). Relative to SMR, SI resulted in reduced H-N motion during turning, accelerating, and speed bumps (1.9-10.7 deg; 0.4-2.6 m/s2), but increased H-N accelerations during abrupt starts/stops and some higher speed tasks (0.4-2.5 m/s2). Ambulance acceleration was moderately correlated to H-N acceleration (r = 0.68) and displacement (r = 0.42). Conclusion: H-N motion was somewhat coupled to ambulance acceleration and varied across a wide range, regardless of SP approach. In general, SI resulted in a modest reduction in H-N displacement and acceleration, with some exceptions. The results inform clinical decisions on SP practice during prehospital transport and demonstrate a novel approach to quantifying H-N motion in prehospital care.

15 keywords...

hide…