• P Reichardt, J-Y Blay, H Gelderblom, M Schlemmer, G D Demetri, B Bui-Nguyen, G A McArthur, S Yazji, Y Hsu, I Galetic, and P Rutkowski.
• HELIOS Klinikum Bad Saarow, Sarkomzentrum Berlin-Brandenburg, Bad Saarow, Germany. peter.reichardt@helios-kliniken.de
• Ann. Oncol. 2012 Jul 1; 23 (7): 1680-7.

BackgroundThis phase III open-label trial investigated the efficacy of nilotinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors following prior imatinib and sunitinib failure.Patients And MethodsPatients were randomized 2:1 to nilotinib 400 mg b.i.d. or best supportive care (BSC; BSC without tyrosine kinase inhibitor, BSC+imatinib, or BSC+sunitinib). Primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS) based on blinded central radiology review (CRR). Patients progressing on BSC could cross over to nilotinib.ResultsTwo hundred and forty-eight patients enrolled. Median PFS was similar between arms (nilotinib 109 days, BSC 111 days; P=0.56). Local investigator-based intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed a significantly longer median PFS with nilotinib (119 versus 70 days; P=0.0007). A trend in longer median overall survival (OS) was noted with nilotinib (332 versus 280 days; P=0.29). Post hoc subset analyses in patients with progression and only one prior regimen each of imatinib and sunitinib revealed a significant difference in median OS of >4 months in favor of nilotinib (405 versus 280 days; P=0.02). Nilotinib was well tolerated.ConclusionIn the ITT analysis, no significant difference in PFS was observed between treatment arms based on CRR. In the post hoc subset analyses, nilotinib provided significantly longer median OS.

53 keywords...

hide…