• Jun Mizutani, Russell Strom, Kuniyoshi Abumi, Kenji Endo, Ken Ishii, Mitsuru Yagi, Bobby Tay, Vedat Deviren, and Christopher Ames.
• Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
• Neurosurgery. 2019 Apr 1; 84 (4): 898-907.

BackgroundThere have been no reports describing how cervical reconstruction surgery affects global spinal alignment (GSA).ObjectiveTo elucidate the effects of cervical reconstruction for GSA through a retrospective multicenter study.MethodsSeventy-eight patients who underwent cervical reconstruction surgery for cervical kyphosis were divided into a Head-balanced group (n = 42) and a Trunk-balanced group (n = 36) according to the values of the C7 plumb line (PL). We also divided the patients into a cervical sagittal balanced group (CSB group, n = 18) and a cervical sagittal imbalanced group (CSI group, n = 60) based on the C2 PL-C7 PL distance. Various sagittal Cobb angles and the sagittal vertical axes were measured before and after surgery.ResultsCervical alignment was improved to achieve occiput-trunk concordance (the distance between the center of gravity [COG] PL, which is considered the virtual gravity line of the entire body, and C7 PL < 30 mm) despite the location of COG PL and C7PL. A subsequent significant change in thoracolumbar alignment was observed in Head-balanced and CSI groups. However, no such significant change was observed in Trunk-balanced and CSB groups. We observed 1 case of transient and 1 case of residual neurological worsening.ConclusionThe primary goal of cervical reconstruction surgery is to achieve occiput-trunk concordance. Once it is achieved, subsequent thoracolumbar alignment changes occur as needed to harmonize GSA. Cervical reconstruction can restore both cervical deformity and GSA. However, surgeons must consider the risks and benefits in such challenging cases.© Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018.

15 keywords...

hide…