• Pain · Jul 2019

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Can a brief psychological expectancy intervention improve postoperative pain? A randomized, controlled trial in patients with breast cancer.

    Articulating positive expectations of analgesia efficacy preoperatively improves postoperative pain scores and analgesia satisfaction.

    pearl
    • Sven Benson, Susanne Hagen, Oliver Hoffmann, Annika Pasler, Ulrike Bingel, Manfred Schedlowski, Jürgen Peters, Sigrid Elsenbruch, and Ulrich H Frey.
    • Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
    • Pain. 2019 Jul 1; 160 (7): 1562-1571.

    AbstractPain after surgery remains a major health problem, calling for optimized treatment regimens to maximize the efficacy of pharmacological interventions. In this randomized controlled trial, we tested in a routine surgical treatment setting whether postoperative pain can be reduced by a brief preoperative intervention, ie, positive verbal suggestions in combination with sham acupuncture, designed to optimize treatment expectations. We hypothesized that the expectancy intervention as add-on to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine reduces patient-reported postoperative pain and improves satisfaction with analgesia. Ninety-six women undergoing breast cancer surgery were randomized at 2 stages: Before surgery, anesthesiologists delivered either positive or neutral verbal suggestions regarding the benefits of acupuncture needling on postoperative pain ("information condition"). Patients were then randomized to receive sham acupuncture or no sham acupuncture during postoperative care ("sham acupuncture condition"). Average pain during the 24-hour observation period after surgery as primary and satisfaction with analgesia as secondary outcome was assessed with standardized measures and analyzed with analysis of covariance accounting for morphine dose, surgery-related, and psychological parameters. Postoperative pain ratings were significantly reduced in patients who received positive treatment-related suggestions (F = 4.45, P = 0.038, main effect of information). Moreover, patients who received an intervention aimed at optimized treatment expectations reported significantly greater satisfaction with analgesia (F = 4.89, P = 0.030, interaction effect). Together, our proof-of-concept data support that optimizing treatment expectations through verbal suggestions may offer a promising approach to improve patient-reported outcomes. Future translational and clinical studies are needed to test such psychological strategies in different surgical interventions, patient groups, and pharmacological treatment regimens.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

    pearl
    1

    Articulating positive expectations of analgesia efficacy preoperatively improves postoperative pain scores and analgesia satisfaction.

    Daniel Jolley  Daniel Jolley
     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.