• Lancet · May 2019

    Meta Analysis

    Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • Soha Sobhy, David Arroyo-Manzano, Nilaani Murugesu, Gayathri Karthikeyan, Vinoth Kumar, Inderjeet Kaur, Evita Fernandez, Sirisha Rao Gundabattula, Ana Pilar Betran, Khalid Khan, Javier Zamora, and Shakila Thangaratinam.
    • Barts Research Centre for Women's Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Multidisciplinary Evidence Synthesis Hub, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Women's Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
    • Lancet. 2019 May 11; 393 (10184): 1973-1982.

    BackgroundUniversal and timely access to a caesarean section is a key requirement for safe childbirth. We identified the burden of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity, and the risk factors following caesarean sections in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).MethodsFor this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched electronic databases including MEDLINE and Embase (from Jan 1, 1990, to Nov 20, 2017), without language restrictions, for studies on maternal or perinatal outcomes following caesarean sections in LMICs. We excluded studies in high-income countries, those involving non-pregnant women, case reports, and studies published before 1990. Two reviewers undertook the study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction independently. The main outcome being assessed was prevalence of maternal mortality in women undergoing caesarean sections in LMICs. We used a random effects model to synthesise the rate data, and reported the association between risk factors and outcomes using odds ratios with 95% CIs. The study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42015029191.FindingsWe included 196 studies from 67 LMICs. The risk of maternal death in women who had a caesarean section (116 studies, 2 933 457 caesarean sections) was 7·6 per 1000 procedures (95% CI 6·6-8·6, τ2=0·81); the highest burden was in sub-Saharan Africa (10·9 per 1000; 9·5-12·5, τ2=0·81). A quarter of all women who died in LMICs (72 studies, 27 651 deaths) had undergone a caesarean section (23·8%, 95% CI 21·0-26·7; τ2=0·62).InterpretationMaternal deaths and perinatal deaths following caesarean sections are disproportionately high in LMICs. The timing and urgency of caesarean section pose major risks.FundingAmmalife Charity and ELLY Appeal, Barts Charity, and the UK National Institute for Health Research.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…