• Eliza E Moskowitz, Clay Cothren Burlew, Ernest E Moore, Fredric M Pieracci, Charles J Fox, Eric M Campion, Ryan A Lawless, and Mitchell J Cohen.
• Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center and the University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States.
• Am. J. Surg. 2018 Apr 1; 215 (4): 675-677.

BackgroundOpen pelvic fractures are life-threatening injuries. Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) has been suggested to be ineffective for hemorrhage control in open pelvic fractures. We hypothesize that PPP is effective at hemorrhage control in patients with open pelvic fractures and reduces mortality.MethodsPatients undergoing PPP from 2005 to 2015 were analyzed. Patients with open pelvic fractures were defined as direct communication of the bony injury with overlying soft tissue, vagina, or rectum.ResultsDuring the 10-year study, 126 patients underwent PPP; 14 (11%) sustained an open pelvic fracture. After PPP, 1 patient (7%) underwent angioembolization with a documented arterial blush. PPP controlled pelvic hemorrhage in all patients. Overall mortality rate was 7% with one death due to traumatic brain injury.ConclusionsPPP is effective for hemorrhage control in patients with open pelvic fractures. PPP should be used in a standard protocol for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures regardless of associated perineal injuries.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

26 keywords...

hide…