-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel and Ambu AuraGain in children: A randomised noninferiority clinical trial.
- Takahiro Mihara, Rika Nakayama, Koui Ka, and Takahisa Goto.
- Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Jun 1; 36 (6): 411-417.
BackgroundSupraglottic airway devices are commonly used in general anaesthesia in children. The AuraGain is a newly developed disposable second-generation supraglottic airway device with an inflatable cuff and a gastric port.ObjectiveTo confirm our hypothesis that the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) of the AuraGain would be noninferior to that of the i-gel in paediatric patients.DesignA single-blinded, randomised, noninferiority, clinical trial.SettingSingle-centre trial from January to March 2017.PatientsOne hundred paediatric patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status 1 to 3), aged up to 12 years old, and body weight of 5 to 30 kg requiring a supraglottic airway for elective surgery with an expected surgery time of less than 2 h under general anaesthesia.InterventionThe patients were randomised to allocation to the AuraGain group or the i-gel group. The device size (1.5 to 2.5) used in each group was based on the manufacturer's recommendation.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome measure was OLP immediately after insertion, with a predefined noninferiority margin of 3 cmH2O.ResultsThe OLP immediately after insertion was lower for the AuraGain than for the i-gel (17.1 vs. 23.0 cmH2O; mean difference: -5.9 cmH2O; 95% confidence interval: -8.5 to -3.3 cmH2O; P = 0.98 and <0.001 for noninferiority and superiority, respectively). The first-attempt success rate (AuraGain, 96% vs. i-gel, 90%; P = 0.44) was comparable between the devices. The incidence of blood staining was lower (AuraGain, 6% vs. i-gel, 0%; P = 0.012) and time to insertion was shorter (AuraGain 21.3 vs. i-gel, 17.1 s; P < 0.001) for the i-gel compared with the AuraGain.ConclusionOur noninferiority hypothesis was not adopted. The OLP of the i-gel may be higher than that of the AuraGain, but this superiority hypothesis should be investigated in future trials. The i-gel demonstrated a shorter time to successful placement and lower incidence of blood staining than the AuraGain.Trial RegistrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network identifier, UMIN000024222.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.