• J Greenhalgh, H Ford, A F Long, and K Hurst.
• Health Care Practice R&D Unit, University of Salford, Allerton Building, Frederick Road, Salford M6 4WT, UK.
• J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 2004 Apr 1; 75 (4): 577-82.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop further a diary originally devised to measure the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) as part of a cost utility study of beta interferon, and to evaluate its reliability, validity, and responsiveness in an outpatient sample of people with MS.MethodsThe original diary was further developed using qualitative and quantitative methods to ensure that it addressed the views of people with MS. The psychometric properties of the MS Symptom and Impact Diary (MSSID) were evaluated in a sample of 77 people who completed the MSSID daily for 12 weeks. Internal and test-retest reliability, discriminant and convergent validity, and responsiveness were assessed using traditional psychometric methods.ResultsThe MSSID formed three, internally consistent scales that measured mobility, fatigue, and the overall impact of MS. The test-retest reliability of the mobility scale was adequate for individual comparisons (ICC>0.90) and the fatigue and overall impact scales were adequate for group comparisons (ICC>0.70). The MSSID was able to distinguish between clinical groups depending on clinical course, indoor ambulation status, and relapse status. It demonstrated associations with other single point instruments in the expected direction. Compared with single point instruments, its responsiveness was similar or better, especially in detecting short term improvements in functioning.ConclusionsThe MSSID may provide a useful complement to currently available instruments to measure the outcomes of MS within clinical trials. Further research is needed to explore its feasibility in the context of a randomised controlled trial and its utility for clinicians.

27 keywords...

hide…