• Eur J Pain · Aug 2019

    Conditioning pain modulation reduces pain only during the first stmimulation of temporal summation of pain paradigm in healthy participants.

    • Sinead Holden, Kristian Kjaer Petersen, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, and Thomas Graven-Nielsen.
    • Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
    • Eur J Pain. 2019 Aug 1; 23 (7): 1390-1396.

    BackgroundPro-nociceptive and anti-nociceptive mechanisms are commonly assessed in clinical and experimental pain studies, but their potential interaction is not well understood.ObjectivesInvestigate the effect of conditioning pain modulation (CPM) on temporal summation of pain (TSP).MethodsTwenty healthy participants underwent cuff algometry assessment on the lower legs to establish the pressure pain tolerance threshold (PTT). For the TSP assessment, ten stimuli at the level of the PTT were delivered by computerised cuff inflations (1-s stimulation, 1-s break) while participants rated pain intensity on a 10-cm electronic visual analogue scale (VAS). This TSP paradigm was then repeated with a simultaneous conditioning stimulus induced by a cuff on the contralateral leg, inflated to a constant pressure corresponding to 30% (mild), 70% (moderate) or 100% (severe) of the PTT. These were assessed in a randomised order, with a fifteen-minute break between tests. A final TSP test without conditioning was reassessed at the end (post-recording).ResultsAn interaction between stimuli (1-10) and repetition (p < 0.05) was found for VAS scores. VAS scores for the first stimulus were decreased during 30%, 70%, and 100% conditioning intensities, compared to baseline and post-recordings (p < 0.05). There was a significant increase in TSP during conditioning (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between baseline and post-recordings for any stimuli (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThe current study indicates that mild to severe stimuli administered by cuff algometry does not modulate summation effect of temporal summation of pain, which could indicate that pain facilitatory mechanisms are more potent compared with pain inhibitory mechanisms.SignificanceCurrent knowledge on the interaction effect of pro and anti-nociceptive paradigms are the lacking. The current study indicates that conditioning pain modulation does not modulate the summation effect of temporal summation of pain, when evaluated by computerized pressure algometry. This finding was independent of the mild, moderate and severe painful conditioning intensities.© 2019 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.