• Resuscitation · Jul 2019

    Observational Study

    Prognostic impact of the conversion to a shockable rhythm from a non-shockable rhythm for patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

    • Alexis Cournoyer, Sylvie Cossette, Brian J Potter, Raoul Daoust, Luc de Montigny, Luc Londei-Leduc, Yoan Lamarche, Dave Ross, Judy Morris, Jean-Marc Chauny, Catalina Sokoloff, Jean Paquet, Martin Marquis, Martin Albert, Francis Bernard, Massimiliano Iseppon, Éric Notebaert, Yiorgos Alexandros Cavayas, and André Denault.
    • Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: alexis.cournoyer@umontreal.ca.
    • Resuscitation. 2019 Jul 1; 140: 43-49.

    ObjectiveFor patients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), having an initial shockable rhythm is a marker of good prognosis. It has been suggested as one of the main prognosticating factors for the selection of patients for extracorporeal resuscitation (E-CPR). However, the prognostic implication of converting from a non-shockable to a shockable rhythm, as compared to having an initial shockable rhythm, remains uncertain, especially among patients that can otherwise be considered eligible for E-CPR. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the initial rhythm and its subsequent conversion and survival following an OHCA, for the general population and for E-CPR candidates.MethodsThis study used a registry of OHCA in Montreal, Canada. Adult patients suffering from a non-traumatic OHCA for whom the initial rhythm was known were included. The association between the initial rhythm and its subsequent conversion or not and survival to discharge was assessed using a multivariable logistic regression.ResultsOf 6681 included patients, 1788 (27%) had an initial shockable rhythm, 1749 (26%) had pulseless electrical activity (PEA) and no subsequent shockable rhythm, 295 (4%) had PEA and a subsequent shockable rhythm, 2694 (40%) had asystole and no subsequent shockable rhythm, and 155 (2%) asystole and a subsequent shockable rhythm. As compared to patients having an initial shockable rhythm, patients in all other groups had significantly lower odds of survival to hospital discharge (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Univariate analyses were performed for E-CPR candidates. Among these 556 (8%) patients, more patients with an initial shockable rhythm survived than patients in all other groups (p < 0.001 for all comparisons).ConclusionsThe initial rhythm remains a much better prognostic marker than subsequent rhythms for all patients suffering from an OHCA, including in the subset of potential E-CPR candidates.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…