-
- Nigel DʼSouza, Michael P M de Neree Tot Babberich, Andre d'Hoore, Emmanuel Tiret, Evaghelos Xynos, Beets-Tan Regina G H RGH The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands., Iris D Nagtegaal, Lennart Blomqvist, Torbjorn Holm, Bengt Glimelius, Antonio Lacy, Andres Cervantes, Robert Glynne-Jones, Nicholas P West, Rodrigo O Perez, Claudio Quadros, Kil Yeon Lee, Thandinkosi E Madiba, Steven D Wexner, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Dushyant Sahani, Brendan Moran, Paris Tekkis, Harm J Rutten, Pieter J Tanis, Theo Wiggers, and Gina Brown.
- Croydon University Hospital, London, UK.
- Ann. Surg. 2019 Dec 1; 270 (6): 955-959.
BackgroundThe wide global variation in the definition of the rectum has led to significant inconsistencies in trial recruitment, clinical management, and outcomes. Surgical technique and use of preoperative treatment for a cancer of the rectum and sigmoid colon are radically different and dependent on the local definitions employed by the clinical team. A consensus definition of the rectum is needed to standardise treatment.MethodsThe consensus was conducted using the Delphi technique with multidisciplinary colorectal experts from October, 2017 to April, 2018.ResultsEleven different definitions for the rectum were used by participants in the consensus. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the most frequent modality used to define the rectum (67%), and the preferred modality for 72% of participants. The most agreed consensus landmark (56%) was "the sigmoid take-off," an anatomic, image-based definition of the junction of the mesorectum and mesocolon. In the second round, 81% of participants agreed that the sigmoid take-off as seen on computed tomography or MRI achieved consensus, and that it could be implemented in their institution. Also, 87% were satisfied with the sigmoid take-off as the consensus landmark.ConclusionAn international consensus definition for the rectum is the point of the sigmoid take-off as visualized on imaging. The sigmoid take-off can be identified as the mesocolon elongates as the ventral and horizontal course of the sigmoid on axial and sagittal views respectively on cross-sectional imaging. Routine application of this landmark during multidisciplinary team discussion for all patients will enable greater consistency in tumour localisation.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.