• Feroze Mahmood, Andrew Maslow, Bilal Chaudary, Peter J Panzica, and Jacob Pugsley.
• Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. hwarraic@bidmc.harvard.edu
• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth.. 2012 Apr 1;26(2):186-90.

ObjectiveTo compare two methods of mitral annular nonplanarity: the mathematically calculated annular height-to-commissural width ratio (AHCWR) and the echocardiographically derived nonplanarity angle.DesignProspective.SettingTertiary care university hospital.InterventionsThree-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.ParticipantsPatients undergoing mitral valve surgery.Measurements And Main ResultsUsing 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, volumetric datasets were acquired from 22 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. The intraoperative nonplanarity angle was calculated with Mitral Valve Assessment software (Tomtec GmbH, Munich, Germany). Furthermore, the datasets acquired during 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography were exported to Matlab software (MathWorks, Natick, MA), which was used to calculate the AHCWR. The nonplanarity angle was seen to correlate favorably with the AHCWR (r = 0.70).ConclusionsA favorable correlation was found between the nonplanarity angle and the AHCWR. This suggests that the nonplanarity angle can be used to assess mitral annular nonplanarity in a clinically feasible fashion.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

10 keywords...

hide…