• Neurosurgery · Jan 2005

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Waterjet dissection versus ultrasonic aspiration in epilepsy surgery.

    • Joachim Oertel, Michael Robert Gaab, Uwe Runge, Henry Werner Siegfried Schroeder, and Juergen Piek.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Nordstadt Hospital, Haltenhoffstrasse 41, Hannover, Germany. oertelj@freenet.de
    • Neurosurgery. 2005 Jan 1; 56 (1 Suppl): 142-6; discussion 142-6.

    ObjectiveWaterjet dissection is currently under close investigation in neurosurgery. Experimentally, precise brain parenchyma dissection with vessel preservation has been demonstrated. Clinically, the safety of the instrument has already been proved. However, precise data demonstrating that waterjet dissection indeed reduces surgical blood loss are still missing.MethodsThe authors applied the waterjet device in a prospective randomized study in comparison with the ultrasonic aspirator. Because there is little variability in the procedure, 30 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy receiving a tailored temporal lobe resection between December 1999 and October 2002 were selected for this study. Intraoperative vessel preservation, intraoperative blood loss, surgical complications, and epilepsy outcome were evaluated. All patients were followed at 3-month intervals.ResultsDuring surgery, both instruments were easy to handle. Only with the waterjet dissector, however, were even small intraparenchymal blood vessels preserved. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced with the waterjet (mean, 70 +/- 46 ml) compared with the ultrasonic aspirator (mean, 121 +/- 48 ml). However, no difference in the necessity for blood transfusion occurred. No difference was observed with respect to operation time (238.6 +/- 37.0 min with the waterjet, 247.5 +/- 41.5 min with the ultrasonic aspirator), surgical complications, and outcome.ConclusionThe waterjet dissector enables a significant reduction of intraoperative blood loss in the investigated setting. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results with a larger number of patients. Studies also are needed to prove that the reduction of blood loss is of clinical relevance for the outcome of the patients.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…