• Eur Spine J · Aug 2001

    Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease.

    • M N Kumar, F Jacquot, and H Hall.
    • Division of Spine Surgery, Orthopaedic and Arthritic Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. kumarmd1@yahoo.com
    • Eur Spine J. 2001 Aug 1; 10 (4): 309-13.

    AbstractThere are very few studies with more than 20 years' follow-up of lumbar spine fusions for disc degeneration. Currently, there is a lot of interest in the subject of degenerative changes above the level of fusion; this study is concerned with such changes in the very long term (30 years). Twenty-eight patients showing sound fusion on radiographs following posterior midline spinal fusion performed by a single surgeon between 1968 and 1970 were compared with an age- and gender-matched group of 28 patients who had undergone surgery for degenerative disc disease without fusion during the same period, by the same surgeon and using similar criteria for evaluation (Short Form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index; functional testing using self-paced walk and timed up-and-go; flexion and extension lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine). In this study, the incidence of radiographic changes at levels above the level of previous involvement was twice as high in the fusion group as in the non-fusion group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the outcomes measured using validated scales and functional testing. The study emphasises the importance of complete evaluation of these patients using validated outcome measurement instruments against the background of radiographic changes and subjective assessment of back pain. It also shows that radiographic changes do not necessarily mean functional impairment in all patients following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.