• Eur Spine J · Apr 2019

    Comparative Study Observational Study

    Comparative tomographic study of the S2-alar-iliac screw versus the iliac screw.

    • Mauro Costa Morais Tavares Junior, João Paço Vaz de Souza, Araujo Thiego Pedro Freitas TPF Spine Surgery, IOT HCFMUSP, São Paulo, Brazil., Raphael Martus Marcon, Alexandre Fogaça Cristante, de Barros Filho Tarcísio Eloy Pessoa TEP Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, IOT HCFMUSP, 171 Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos St., São Paulo, SP, 05403010, Brazil., and Olavo Biraghi Letaif.
    • Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, IOT HCFMUSP, 171 Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos St., São Paulo, SP, 05403010, Brazil. mauro_div@hotmail.com.
    • Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr 1; 28 (4): 855-862.

    AimsIliac screws and S2-alar-iliac screws provide adequate mechanical stability for the fixation of lumbosacral spine pathologies, which has led to a significant increase in the use of these techniques in the routine practice of spine surgeons. However, studies on the ideal technical positioning for both techniques are limited.Study DesignThis is an observational, retrospective, analytical descriptive study.ObjectiveTo analyze, describe and compare the insertion and positioning parameters of the S2-alar-iliac and iliac screw techniques in adult patients without spinal deformities.MethodsThe present study comprises a retrospective analysis of lumbosacral computed tomography images selected continuously in 2016 from 25 patients at a university hospital. Mann-Whitney-Shapiro-Wilk tests were performed. Data reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation.ResultsThe mean length of the iliac screw was greater than that of the S2-alar-iliac screw, and the S2-alar-iliac screw sat 20.5 mm deeper than the iliac screw. The mean of the greatest bone thickness for the iliac screw was 20.72 mm; that of the S2-alar-iliac screw was 23.24 mm. The mean distance from the iliac screw entry point to the skin was 32.46 mm, and the mean distance from the S2-alar-iliac screw entry point to the skin was 52.87 mm.ConclusionThe trajectory of the S2-alar-iliac screws studied via computed tomography was greater in terms of bone thickness and deeper relative to the skin compared with the iliac screws. The S2-alar-iliac technique may have desirable clinical advantages in terms of the diameter of the screws and reduced protrusion when used in adults. These slides can be retrieved from Electronic supplementary material.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.