• Cory M Czajka, Andrew Kay, Joshua L Gary, Mark L Prasarn, Andrew M Choo, John W Munz, William H Harvin, and Timothy S Achor.
• *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX; and †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX.
• J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Apr 1; 31 (4): 236-240.

ObjectivesTo determine the proportion of patients requiring secondary surgery for symptomatic implant removal after open reduction, internal fixation using dual mini-fragment plating technique for clavicular shaft fractures.DesignRetrospective observational study.SettingSingle university Level 1 trauma center.PatientsEighty-one patients treated with open reduction, internal fixation using dual mini-fragment plating technique for clavicular shaft fractures (OTA/AO 15-B1, B2, and B3) with minimum 12-month follow-up (median 477 days; range 371-1549 days).InterventionOpen reduction, internal fixation using dual mini-fragment plating technique for clavicular shaft fractures.Main Outcome MeasurementsIncidence of secondary surgery, QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores.ResultsSix of 81 patients (7.4%) underwent secondary surgery for implant removal for any reason. Of these, 3 (3.7%) underwent symptomatic implant (soft-tissue irritation) removal, 2 (2.5%) required implant removal in the setting of infection, and 1 patient (1.2%) required revision open reduction internal fixation for early implant failure. The mean QuickDASH score in this series was 8.44 (±6.94, range 0-77.27). The associated implant cost of the typical construct utilized in this series was $1511.38. The mean surgical time was 97 minutes (range 71-143 minutes).ConclusionsThe utilization of a dual mini-fragment plating technique in the treatment of clavicular shaft fractures results in a low rates of secondary surgery for symptomatic implant removal (3.7%) and similar QuickDASH scores when compared with historical controls treated with 3.5-mm plates placed on the superior clavicle. Potential disadvantages in using this technique include a higher surgical implant cost and length of surgery.Level Of EvidenceTherapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

41 keywords...

hide…