• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Oct 2019

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Ultrasound-assisted vs. landmark-guided paramedian spinal anaesthesia in the elderly: A randomised controlled trial.

    • Sun-Kyung Park, Seokha Yoo, Won Ho Kim, Young-Jin Lim, Bahk Jae-Hyon JH, and Jin-Tae Kim.
    • From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S-KP, SY, WHK, Y-JL, J-HB, J-TK).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct 1; 36 (10): 763-771.

    BackgroundNeuraxial ultrasound might improve the efficacy of spinal anaesthesia but this has not been tested for the paramedian approach in the elderly.ObjectiveThe current study aims to assess whether the ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique can decrease the number of needle passes required for success compared with the landmark-guided paramedian technique in the elderly.DesignRandomised controlled study.SettingSingle-institution, tertiary-level hospital in Seoul, Republic of Korea from October 2017 to January 2018.PatientsEighty patients aged at least 60 years undergoing orthopaedic surgery.InterventionAll received paramedian spinal anaesthesia by either the landmark-guided or preprocedural ultrasound-assisted technique.Main Outcome MeasuresThe number of needle passes required for successful dural puncture.ResultsThe number of needle passes (median [interquartile range]) was significantly lower (1.0 [1.0 to 2.0] vs. 4.5 [2.0 to 7.0]) and the success rate at first pass significantly higher at 65.0 vs. 17.5% in the ultrasound compared with the landmark group (both P < 0.001). The ultrasound-assisted technique required a longer time for establishing landmarks (117.5 s [85.5 to 150.7 s] vs. 17.5 s [14.0 to 23.0 s]) and for total procedure (181.5 s [133.5 to 212.5 s] vs. 92.5 s [62.5 to 176.5 s]) but a shorter time for administering spinal anaesthesia (39.5 s [31.5 to 71.3 s] vs. 77.0 s [45.8 to 136.5 s]; all, P < 0.001) than the palpation-guided technique. The ultrasound group showed lower periprocedural pain scores (3 [2 to 4] vs. 4 [4 to 6]; P = 0.009) and discomfort scores (2 [0 to 3] vs. 5 [2 to 6]; P = 0.003) than the landmark group.ConclusionCompared with the landmark-guided paramedian technique, the ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique decreases the number of needle manipulations and periprocedural pain and discomfort scores in the elderly. Our results suggest that neuraxial ultrasonography facilitates the performance of spinal anaesthesia in the elderly.Trial RegistrationNCT03316352.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.