• U Schulze Raestrup, A Grams, and R Smektala.
• Geschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung Westfalen-Lippe, Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe, Gartenstr. 210-214, 48147 Münster, Deutschland. ulrich.schulze.raestrup@aekwl.de
• Unfallchirurg. 2008 Feb 1; 111 (2): 65-70.

BackgroundWhereas the Scottish guidelines are audited annually, nobody evaluates guideline compliance in Germany. Thus, can external quality assurance data pursuant to section 137 of the German Social Code Book V be suitable for auditing guideline compliance?Materials And MethodsFrom North Rhine Westphalia, a total of 48,831 cases of femoral fractures near the hip joint were evaluated. Compliance with the guidelines was determined based on preoperative hospital stay, thrombosis, and antibiotic prophylaxis. Guideline rationale was reviewed in terms of mortality and thromboembolism rate.ResultsSixty-four percent of the interventions were performed in a timely manner. Thrombosis prophylaxis was given in 99% of cases. Antibiotics were given as a single shot. There was no connection between mortality and thromboembolism rates or time to surgery.ConclusionGuideline compliance is similar in German and Scotland. The external quality assurance data are suitable for evaluating guideline compliance. The literature recommends a short time to surgery. Given the short observation period, it was not possible to demonstrate any improvement in outcomes.

31 keywords...

hide…