• J A van Noord, J Clément, M Cauberghs, I Mertens, K P Van de Woestijne, and M Demedts.
• Dept of Pathophysiology, Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium.
• Eur. Respir. J. 1989 Oct 1; 2 (9): 846-52.

AbstractIn 54 patients with interstitial lung diseases and no signs of airway obstruction we measured lung volumes, maximal expiratory flows, diffusing capacity (DLCO), total respiratory resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) between 4 and 26 Hz by means of the forced oscillation technique. In all patients DLCO was less than 75% of the expected value. Patients were classified into two groups depending on total lung capacity (TLC): group A with TLC less than 80% of expected, and group B with TLC of 80% or more. Group A demonstrated a decrease of Xrs especially at low frequencies, with small, not significant changes in Rrs. In the patients in this group with the lowest values of TLC (less than 50%), we observed an increase of Rrs at low frequencies causing a negative frequency dependence of Rrs. In group B no distinct changes of Rrs and Xrs occurred. Canonical correlation analysis between routine lung function data and forced oscillation parameters, showed tight correlations between TLC in absolute value or VC in percent of the predicted value on the one hand and average level of Xrs and average slope of Xrs (and Rrs) vs frequency curves on the other hand. Measurements of lung mechanics in five additional patients and comparison with a model of the respiratory system suggest that the changes of Rrs and Xrs are not explained totally by the observed increase in lung tissue resistance and decrease in lung compliance. The observed changes in Rrs and Xrs are not specific for restrictive lung disorders; similar changes are met also in moderately advanced obstructive diseases.

15 keywords...

hide…