-
Pediatr Crit Care Me · Aug 2019
Multicenter StudyDecision-Making Around Positive Tracheal Aspirate Cultures: The Role of Neutrophil Semiquantification in Antibiotic Prescribing.
- Sirisha Yalamanchi, Lisa Saiman, and Philip Zachariah.
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
- Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2019 Aug 1; 20 (8): e380-e385.
ObjectivesVentilator-associated infections are a major contributor to antibiotic use in the PICU. Quantitative or semiquantitative assessment of neutrophils (microscopic purulence) is routinely reported in positive cultures from tracheal aspirates. The role of microscopic purulence in guiding antibiotic therapy or its association with symptoms of ventilator-associated infections is less described in children. We examine microscopic purulence as an independent predictor of antibiotic use for positive tracheal aspirate cultures in the PICU.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingTertiary care pediatric hospital.PatientsChildren admitted to the PICU, neuro-PICU, or cardiac PICU with a positive tracheal aspirate culture from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsPositive tracheal aspirate cultures were reviewed. The outcome variable was antibiotic treatment that targeted the positive tracheal aspirate culture. The predictor variable was microscopic purulence, defined as moderate or many neutrophils on Gram stain report. Competing predictors included demographics, comorbidities, vital signs changes, respiratory support, and laboratory values. Of 361 positive cultures in the cohort, 81 (22%) were treated with antibiotics. Positive cultures with microscopic purulence were targeted for therapy more frequently (30% vs 11%). Microscopic purulence was the strongest predictor for antibiotic therapy (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6-6.8) compared with fever (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-4.1) or increased respiratory support (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3). There was no significant variation in symptomatology between microscopic purulence reported as moderate or many versus other (e.g., fever -24% vs 22%, increased respiratory support -36% vs 28%). Microscopic purulence was less prevalent with longer ventilator durations at the time of sampling.ConclusionsMicroscopic purulence was an independent predictor of antibiotic therapy for positive tracheal aspirate cultures in our PICUs. However, microscopic purulence was not associated with clinical symptomatology.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.