-
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz · Nov 2009
Childhood vaccination schedules in Europe vary widely. Is this a problem?
- P L Lopalco, H G de Carvalho, P Kreidl, K Leitmeyer, and J Giesecke.
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 171 83, Stockholm, Sweden. pierluigi.lopalco@ecdc.europa.eu
- Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2009 Nov 1; 52 (11): 1095-8.
AbstractChildhood vaccination programmes in Europe are basically very safe and effective. On the other hand there are very large differences between countries in the way they are organised. In this paper we analyse the immunisation schedules used in 29 European countries to highlight similarities and differences. One of the most evident differences is the total number of doses administered under 18 years of age, which ranges between 4 and 7 if we consider DT-containing vaccines. Any change in vaccination schedules is associated with costs. Thus, this process is worthy only if it can lead in the long run to an overall improvement in the national vaccination programmes. National sovereignty in the area of vaccination programmes prevails; therefore any step forward will be feasible only if consensus in Europe is reached.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.