-
Obstetrics and gynecology · Jun 1980
Ineffectiveness of povidone-iodine irrigation of abdominal incisions.
- P C Galle and H D Homesley.
- Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Jun 1; 55 (6): 744-7.
AbstractTwo to four percent of uncontaminated surgical wounds become infected; the incidence is increased in contaminated cases. The present study was designed to determine the efficacy of wound irrigation with povidone-iodine in patients not receiving prophylactic antibiotics who were undergoing gynecologic operations. The results revealed no significant difference in the relatively high occurrence of wound infections, morbidity, and elevated fever indices between the povidone-iodine wound irrigation group of patients and the control group. From a review of previous studies of topical antibiotics and antiseptics in contaminated cases as well as from the present findings, providone-iodine wound irrigation without assocaited use of prophylactic antibiotics does not appear to reduce significantly the incidence of wound infections in patients with potential vaginal contamination.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..