• Joshua R Lakin, Emily Benotti, Joanna Paladino, Natalie Henrich, and Justin Sanders.
• 1 Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
• J Palliat Med. 2019 Jul 1; 22 (7): 751-763.

Abstract Background: Evidence demonstrates that discussion between clinicians and seriously ill patients about their goals and preferences, or serious illness communication, is a high-value intervention, resulting in growing demand for improvement in this area. Promising efforts address this demand utilizing interprofessional teams; yet, we lack insight into how different professions work together to deliver better serious illness communication. Objective: To explore the perceptions of primary care clinicians about interprofessional work in serious illness communication. Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured key informant interviews. Settings/Subjects: Primary care clinicians (physicians, care coordination nurses, and social workers) who have experience implementing a structured primary palliative care program, the Serious Illness Care Program, at a large academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts. Results: We derived primary themes and subthemes from participant descriptions of program implementation: the importance and value of interprofessional teams, nurses, and individual initiative; the role of preparation and structure in enabling high-quality communication; and the ways in which attempts to improve serious illness communication reveal other problems that can limit program effectiveness or be perceived as program failures. We derived a conceptual model that illustrates the relationships between interprofessional team interactions, workflows, and perceived program outcomes. Conclusions: This study suggests three key areas of focus for design and implementation of programs aimed at improving serious illness conversations by interprofessional primary care teams: establishing clear professional roles and responsibilities, paying special attention to interprofessional and clinician-patient relationships, and clearly structuring interventions aiming to change the way our system drives serious illness communication.

19 keywords...

hide…