• J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. · Dec 2019

    Critical design considerations for time-to-event endpoints in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials.

    • van EijkRuben P ARPA0000-0002-7132-5967Department of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands R.P.A.vanEijk-2@umcutrecht.nl.Biostatistics & Research Support, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and P, Stavros Nikolakopoulos, RoesKit C BKCBBiostatistics & Research Support, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Bas M Middelkoop, Toby A Ferguson, Pamela J Shaw, P Nigel Leigh, Ammar Al-Chalabi, EijkemansMarinus J CMJCBiostatistics & Research Support, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands., and Leonard H van den Berg.
    • Department of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands R.P.A.vanEijk-2@umcutrecht.nl.
    • J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 2019 Dec 1; 90 (12): 133113371331-1337.

    BackgroundFunding and resources for low prevalent neurodegenerative disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are limited, and optimising their use is vital for efficient drug development. In this study, we review the design assumptions for pivotal ALS clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints and provide optimised settings for future trials.MethodsWe extracted design settings from 13 completed placebo-controlled trials. Optimal assumptions were estimated using parametric survival models in individual participant data (n=4991). Designs were compared in terms of sample size, trial duration, drug use and costs.ResultsPrevious trials overestimated the hazard rate by 18.9% (95% CI 3.4% to 34.5%, p=0.021). The median expected HR was 0.56 (range 0.33-0.66). Additionally, we found evidence for an increasing mean hazard rate over time (Weibull shape parameter of 2.03, 95% CI 1.93 to 2.15, p<0.001), which affects the design and planning of future clinical trials. Incorporating accrual time and assuming an increasing hazard rate at the design stage reduced sample size by 33.2% (95% CI 27.9 to 39.4), trial duration by 17.4% (95% CI 11.6 to 23.3), drug use by 14.3% (95% CI 9.6 to 19.0) and follow-up costs by 21.2% (95% CI 15.6 to 26.8).ConclusionsImplementing distributional knowledge and incorporating accrual at the design stage could achieve large gains in the efficiency of ALS clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints. We provide an open-source platform that helps investigators to make more accurate sample size calculations and optimise the use of their available resources.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.