• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Sep 2019

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Comparison of low and high positive end-expiratory pressure during low tidal volume ventilation in robotic gynaecological surgical patients using electrical impedance tomography: A randomised controlled trial.

    • Eun Hee Chun, Hee Jung Baik, Hye-Sung Moon, and Kyungah Jeong.
    • From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University (HJB), Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine (EHC), and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (HM, KJ).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep 1; 36 (9): 641-648.

    BackgroundThe appropriate level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during intra-operative mechanical ventilation remains unclear.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different levels of PEEP with low tidal volume (low-VT) ventilation in a steep Trendelenburg position (30°) and pneumoperitoneum on oxygenation, respiratory mechanics and ventilation distribution using electrical impedance tomography.DesignA randomised controlled trial.SettingSingle university secondary care centre, conducted from January 2017 to December 2017.PatientsForty female patients, aged 20 to 60 years, and of American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status 1 or 2, undergoing elective robotic gynaecological surgery were included.InterventionForty patients were allocated randomly to a PEEP4 (PEEP 4 cmH2O) group or a PEEP8 (PEEP 8 cmH2O) group.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcomes were respiratory mechanics. The secondary outcomes included changes in ventilation distribution across the ventral and dorsal regions of interest and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) using a modified clinical pulmonary infection score.ResultsThere was no difference in PaO2 at any time point. The peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) and mean airway pressure (MPAW) of the PEEP4 group were lower than those of the PEEP8 group (P < 0.001). The oxygenation factor in the PEEP4 group was higher than that in the PEEP8 group during mechanical ventilation at all times. There was no difference in the fractional distribution of end-expiratory ventilation according to region of interest between the two groups.ConclusionBoth 4 and 8 cmH2O of PEEP with low-VT ventilation can be used for robotic gynaecological surgery that requires a steep Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum. However, 8 cmH2O of PEEP had no benefit over 4 cmH2O of PEEP with respect to oxygenation and improvement of dorsal regional ventilation.Trial RegistrationThe trial was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea (KCT0002255). https://cris.nih.go.kr.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…