• Am. J. Ophthalmol. · Jun 2011

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopic configurations among primary angle closure, its suspects, and nonoccludable angles: the Kumejima Study.

    • Ichiko Medoruma Henzan, Atsuo Tomidokoro, Chiharu Uejo, Hiroshi Sakai, Shoichi Sawaguchi, Aiko Iwase, and Makoto Araie.
    • Department of Ophthalmology, University of the Ryukyus, Graduate School of Medicine, Okinawa, Japan.
    • Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2011 Jun 1; 151 (6): 1065-1073.e1.

    PurposeTo quantitatively characterize the ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) configurations of the peripheral anterior chamber (AC) in primary angle closure (PAC) and its suspects and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the UBM parameters to differentiate PAC/PAC suspects in a population-based setting.DesignCross-sectional study.MethodsA random 461 of 4632 residents 40 years or older on a southwest island in Japan underwent UBM under light and dark conditions.ResultsOf the 374 eligible randomly sampled residents (after excluding 87 with a history of intraocular surgeries, ocular trauma, or iritis; a physical or mental disability making the UBM measurement difficult; or refusal to undergo UBM measurements), reliable UBM images were obtained in 301 right eyes (80.4%). In 45 eyes with PAC/PAC suspects compared to 256 with nonoccludable angles, the angle-opening distance (AOD), trabecular-iris angle (TIA), and trabecular-ciliary process distance (TCPD) under light and dark conditions were smaller (P < .001), while the iris thickness was smaller only under dark conditions (P = .040). Dark-light changes in the AOD and TIA were significantly smaller in the PAC/PAC suspects than in the nonoccludable angles (P < .03); the iris thicknesses did not differ significantly between them. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the AOD at 500 μm from the scleral spur (AOD500) and TIA in light were 0.94, suggesting these parameters were good for differentiating PAC/PAC suspects. The ideal cutoff values for the AOD500 and TIA under light conditions were 0.17 mm (sensitivity, 0.82; specificity, 0.96) and 15.2 degrees (sensitivity, 0.83, specificity, 0.93), respectively.ConclusionsEyes with PAC/PAC suspects had shallow ACs, anteriorly located ciliary bodies, and smaller dark-light changes in the peripheral AC depth, while the iris thickness was similar to that in eyes with nonoccludable angles. The peripheral AC depth under light conditions could most clearly differentiate PAC/PAC suspects from nonoccludable angles.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…