• Chirurgia italiana · Mar 1999

    Comparative Study

    Small solitary pulmonary nodules: assessment of enhancement and enhancement patterns in benign and malignant tumours by high resolution computed tomography.

    • G Potente, V D'Andrea, V Cantisani, A Berni, and E De Antoni.
    • Department of Radiology, University La Sapienza of Rome.
    • Chir Ital. 1999 Mar 1; 51 (2): 113-20.

    AbstractOur aim was to determine the accuracy of quantitative and qualitative findings of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) by means of differential analysis of small uncalcified solitary pulmonary nodules and to compare the CT diagnosis with the results of transthoracic needle biopsies (TTNB). We assessed a consecutive series of 109 patients with 66 malignant or 45 benign pulmonary nodules before TTNB and surgery with contrast and high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Pulmonary nodules were classified as small when equal to or smaller than 15 mm and large when larger than 15 mm. Diagnostic accuracy of CT qualitative evaluation was 95% for large nodules and 92% for small nodules. Specificity was 92% for small nodules, 80% for large nodules. Enhancing regular septa were observed in 28 hamartomas (80%) while except for two cases (3%), inner septa were absent or irregular in malignant tumours. TTNB accuracy was 70% for small nodules and 94% for large ones. Low-enhancing hamartomas are more frequent in Italy than in the US where the prevalence of high-enhancing granulomas in benign nodules reduces the specificity of quantitative CT analysis. We propose that certain geographic areas would benefit from enhanced-CT in place of TTNB in managing lung nodules equal to or less than 1.5 cm.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.