• Yuru Boon, Win Sen Kuan, Yiong Huak Chan, Irwani Ibrahim, and Mui Teng Chua.
• Emergency Department, National Healthcare Group, Woodlands Health Campus, 17 Woodlands Drive, Singapore, 738097, Singapore.
• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Apr 1; 47 (2): 365-372.

IntroductionArterial blood gas (ABG) sampling is routinely performed in major trauma patients to assess the severity of hemorrhagic shock. Compared to venous blood gas (VBG), ABG is an additional procedure with risks of hematoma and pain. We aim to determine if pH, base deficit (BD), and lactate from VBG and ABG in trauma patients are clinically equivalent. If proven, the need for ABG and its associated risks can be eliminated.MethodsThis prospective observational study was conducted in the Emergency Department of National University Hospital, Singapore, between February and October 2016. We correlated paired ABG and VBG results in adult trauma patients. VBG and ABG were obtained within 10 min and processed within 5 min using a point-of-care blood gas analyzer. Bland-Altman plot analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between peripheral VBG and ABG in terms of pH, base deficit and lactate.ResultsThere were 102 patients included, with a median age of 34 (interquartile range 28-46) years and male predominance (90.2%). Majority of patients sustained blunt trauma (96.1%), and had injuries of Tier 1 and Tier 2 severity (60/102, 58.8%). Bland-Altman plot analyses demonstrated that only 72.6% of venous pH and 76.5% of venous BD lie within the pre-defined clinically acceptable limits of agreement, whereas 96.0% of venous lactate was within these limits.ConclusionVenous and arterial pH and BD are not within clinically acceptable limits of agreement, and ABG should be obtained for accurate acid-base status. However, venous lactate may be an acceptable substitute for arterial lactate.

15 keywords...

hide…