• Evangelos Anagnostou, Andreas Larentzakis, and Pantelis Vassiliu.
• Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark St, Whitechapel, E1 2AT, London, UK; 401 General Military Hospital of Athens, P. Kanellopoulou Ave., Athens, 11525, Greece. Electronic address: e.anagnostou@smd17.qmul.ac.uk.
• Injury. 2018 Jul 1; 49 (7): 1243-1250.

IntroductionImplementation of trauma systems has markedly assisted in improving outcomes of the injured patient. However, differences exist internationally as diverse social factors, economic conditions and national particularities are placing obstacles. The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the current Greek trauma system, provide a comprehensive review and suggest key actions.MethodsAn exhaustive search of the - scarce on this subject - English and Greek literature was carried out to analyze all the main components of the Greek trauma system, according to American College of Surgeons' criteria, as well as the WHO Trauma Systems Maturity Index.ResultsRegarding prevention, efforts are in the right direction lowering the road traffic incidents-related death rate, however rural and insular regions remain behind. Hellenic Emergency Medical Service (EKAB) has well-defined communications and emergency phone line but faces problems with educating people on how to use it properly. In addition, equal and systematic training of ambulance personnel is a challenge, with the lack of pre-hospital registry and EMS quality assessment posing a question on where the related services are currently standing. Redistribution of facilities' roles with the establishment of the first formal trauma centre in the existing infrastructure would facilitate the development of a national registry and introduction of the trauma surgeon subspecialty with proper training potential. Definite rehabilitation institutional protocols that include both inpatient and outpatient care are needed. Disaster preparedness entails an extensive national plan and regular drills, mainly at the pre-hospital level. The lack, however, of any accompanying quality assurance programs hampers the effort to yield the desirable results.ConclusionDespite recent economic crisis in Greece, actions solving logistics and organising issues may offer a well-defined, integrated trauma system without uncontrollably raising the costs. Political will is needed for reforms that use pre-existing infrastructure and working power in a more efficient way, with a first line priority being the establishment of the first major trauma centre that could function as the cornerstone for the building of the Greek trauma system.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

23 keywords...

hide…