-
- Joshua Feler, Amy Tan, Amanda Sammann, Charles Matouk, and David Y Hwang.
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
- World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov 1; 131: e371-e378.
BackgroundDeciding to treat unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) involves discussion with patients about outcomes data and personal attitudes toward risk of rupture versus procedural complication risk. We performed a qualitative analysis of online interpatient discussions to investigate perspectives on medical decision making.MethodsOn an aneurysm-specific forum, we identified patient conversation threads created between December 3, 2016 and December 3, 2018 containing discussion of medical decision making. These threads were analyzed using an adapted grounded-theory approach. Two researchers coded each thread and discussed discrepancies until consensus was reached. Coded content was analyzed to identify emergent themes.ResultsWe analyzed 40 threads from a foundation-sponsored intracranial aneurysm-specific patient forum in the public domain. There were 110 user accounts, contributing 527 posts of average length 108 words. Fifty-seven users described diagnosis of UIA without history of rupture, and 20 described presentation with rupture. Patients 1) felt fortunate for diagnosis with UIA but were challenged by decision making and concern for rupture, 2) desired treatment by providers with large case volumes, clear communication, and an unbiased approach to decision making, 3) acted on qualitative understandings of individual risk, 4) considered psychological, social, and clinical factors in forming preferences for management, 5) sought information for purposes other than informing decision making, and 6) regained control through decision-making processes.ConclusionsThis is the first ethnographic account of decision making among patients with UIAs. Newly diagnosed patients explored treatment options using online forums. They faced ambiguity in identifying optimal management, creating apprehension and decisional conflict. Further research is required to improve risk communication and individualized decision making for patients with UIAs.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.