-
Am J Health Syst Pharm · Feb 2016
Comparative StudyPredictive performance of glomerular filtration rate estimation equations based on cystatin C versus serum creatinine values in critically ill patients.
- Elisa Diego, Pedro Castro, Dolors Soy, Esteban Poch, and Josep M Nicolás.
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
- Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Feb 15; 73 (4): 206-15.
PurposeThe predictive performance of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation equations based on cystatin C versus serum creatinine (SCr) values in critically ill patients was evaluated.MethodsA retrospective observational study was performed in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital from October 2006 through September 2007. All consecutively admitted critically ill patients older than 18 years who stayed in the ICU for more than 48 hours with a urinary bladder catheter in place were included in the study. Data collected included SCr, cystatin C, serum albumin, blood urea nitrogen, and 24-hour urine creatinine clearance [Formula: see text] levels. The following equations were also used to determine the estimated GFR that was compared with the reference [Formula: see text] for all patients in the study: Arnal-Dade using cystatin C, Cockcroft-Gault using actual body weight, Cockcroft-Gault using ideal body weight, Jelliffe, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and four-variable version MDRD (MDRD-4).ResultsThis study included 241 measurements corresponding to 131 critically ill patients. The cystatin C-based equation underestimated [Formula: see text], whereas overestimation by every SCr-based formula was observed in the whole cohort and in the [Formula: see text] subgroup; MDRD-4 was the most biased equation in every analysis. There were no significant differences in precision, except for great variability in the subgroup with a [Formula: see text] of <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), where the MDRD equation showed better results than the cystatin C-based equation (33.5% versus 38.9%). No equations fulfilled concordance requirements with [Formula: see text].ConclusionA retrospective observational study showed no evidence of superiority of a cystatin C-based equation over SCr-based equations to estimate the GFR in an ICU population.Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.