• Alex Schmucker, Roy Chen, Shobhan Vachhrajani, Melissa Martinek, and Michael Albert.
• Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, USA.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Apr 1; 140 (4): 449-455.

PurposeTo determine the factors that influence radiation exposure during repair of supracondylar humerus fractures.MethodsMedical records of almost 200 children with supracondylar fractures were retrospectively analyzed for variables correlated with fluoroscopy time and radiation dose as measures of radiation exposure.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in fluoroscopy time (27 vs. 22 s p = 0.345) or direct radiation dose (0.394 vs. 0.318 mSv p = 0.290) between uniplanar and biplanar C-arm use. No statistically significant differences in fluoroscopy time or radiation dose were found for surgical technique, comorbid ipsilateral fractures, preoperative neurovascular compromise, or resident participation. There was a significant 8.3 s increase in fluoroscopy time (p = 0.022) and 0.249 mSv increase in radiation dose (p = 0.020) as the fracture type increased from II to III. An increase in one pin during CRPP resulted in a statistically significant 10.4 s increase in fluoroscopy time and a 0.205 mSv increase in radiation dose. There were significant differences between the physician with the lowest fluoroscopy time and radiation dose compared with the physicians with the two highest values for both fluoroscopy time and radiation dose (p < 0.01).ConclusionsWe found no significant difference in direct radiation exposure or fluoroscopy time when comparing biplanar to uniplanar C-arm use, resident participation, preoperative neurovascular compromise, or for comorbid ipsilateral fractures. Both outcomes increased significantly as fracture type increased from II to III and as the number of pins used during CRPP increased. Both outcomes were significantly different between the surgeons performing CRPP.

23 keywords...

hide…