• Ellen M Soffin and Stavros G Memtsoudis.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA - soffine@hss.edu.
• Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Dec 1; 84 (12): 1406-1412.

AbstractThe demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rising worldwide. Controversy persists in the literature regarding the benefits of general versus neuraxial anesthesia and which anesthetic is associated with the best outcomes. Likewise, the abundance of analgesic options for post-TKA pain have led to debate regarding the safest, most effective regimens. In this paper, we evaluated a selection of recent publications regarding anesthetic and analgesic choices for TKA. High-quality studies and meta-analyses linking anesthetic agents and analgesic modalities to clinically important outcomes were chosen wherever possible. We included a range of clinical and population-based research, incorporating established and emerging techniques. Although not uniform, clinical and population-based data favor neuraxial anesthesia, and suggest less morbidity compared to general anesthesia. There is good evidence to support an opioid-minimizing, multimodal approach to post-TKA analgesia, featuring peripheral nerve blocks and/or peri-articular injection. The recently described IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee) block may address posterior knee pain after TKA. Ultrasound-guided regional analgesia techniques are cost and clinically effective. Liposomal bupivacaine represents an expanding topic of research in TKA-analgesia, but currently, data do not support routine use. Evidence to guide the creation of pathways of care for TKA abounds, but must be tailored to local practice to maximize chances of success. Recent data supports the use of neuraxial anesthesia and regional analgesia techniques for TKA. Recommendations for clinical practice and future research to improve the state of the art are provided.

19 keywords...

hide…