• Can Assoc Radiol J · Oct 1999

    The incidence of sacroiliac joint disease in patients with low-back pain.

    • J C Hodge and B Bessette.
    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Que. jchodge@rad.mgh.mcgill.ca
    • Can Assoc Radiol J. 1999 Oct 1; 50 (5): 321-3.

    PurposeThe clinical presentation of intervertebral disc, facet joint, nerve root, and sacroiliac (SI) joint diseases are often indistinguishable. SI joint arthritis likely accounts for a significant proportion of what is called "low-back pain" or "sciatica." Our goal was to determine the incidence of SI joint arthritis in patients with this presentation.MethodsComputed tomographic (CT) scans of the lumbosacral spine (LSS) of patients referred with low-back pain, sciatica, spinal stenosis or disc pathology were gathered over a 3-month period. Scans were retrospectively reviewed by 2 independent readers for SI joint arthritis. When there was disagreement, the 2 readers reviewed the case and reached a concensus opinion. SI joint arthritis was considered to be present if subchondral sclerosis, osteophytosis, or cartilage loss was noted on the CT scan.ResultsThe SI joint(s) were visualized by both readers on 64 LSS CT scans performed in 29 women and 35 men, mean age 52 years. By the aforementioned criteria, 16 SI joints (25%) were considered normal by both readers. In 48 cases (75%), there was evidence of osteoarthritis. The diagnosis of osteoarthritis was made by concensus opinion in 8 of these 48 cases (16%).ConclusionThere is a relatively high incidence of SI joint arthritis in patients undergoing evaluation for "low-back pain" or "sciatica." Hence, SI joint arthritis should be considered a possible diagnosis in these patients.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…