• Jasper van der Slegt, Jan A J W Kluytmans, Paul G H Mulder, Eelco J Veen, Gwan H Ho, and Lijckle van der Laan.
• 1 Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital , Breda, The Netherlands .
• Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Dec 1; 15 (6): 752-6.

BackgroundPatients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at risk for revision surgery in the groin and therefore at potential risk for surgical site infections (SSIs). In an observational study, a cohort of patients with peripheral arterial disease was followed to examine the effect of different incision intervals on SSI-free survival.MethodsPatients, needing peripheral vascular surgery because of PAD, were retrieved from a prospectively collected database on SSIs after vascular surgery between March 2009 and January 2012, the group consisting of 720 patients. Of these, 255 patients were selected (age 71.9±10.4 y). Cox proportional hazards models were used for event-history analyses. The effect of incision interval was estimated with adjustment for a number of potential confounders. Effects were quantified by means of hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsNo significant effect on the incision interval on SSI-free survival was observed. After separating incisional SSIs into superficial- and deep-seated, a significant linear trend effect of the groin incision interval on deep-incisional SSI development was observed: the shorter the interval, the higher the event rate (HR 1.5 per category, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, p=0.22). Besides the incision interval, the Rutherford classification was a significant risk factor for SSI development (HR 3.0; 95% CI 2.1-4.2; p<0.0005).ConclusionRevision surgery in the groin puts patients at risk for deep-incisional SSI. No effect on superficial incisional SSI development was observed. Besides the incision interval, the Rutherford classification was a significant risk factor for both superficial- and deep-incisional SSI. Quality improvement and better risk stratification schemes are suggested.

15 keywords...

hide…