• J Orthop Sci · Jul 2006

    Relation between atlantoaxial (C1/2) and cervical alignment (C2-C7) angles with Magerl and Brooks techniques for atlantoaxial subluxation in rheumatoid arthritis.

    • Yoshiharu Kato, Tatsuo Itoh, Koichi Kanaya, Motoya Kubota, and Shunichi Ito.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
    • J Orthop Sci. 2006 Jul 1; 11 (4): 347-52.

    BackgroundA few studies have reported the relation between the atlantoaxial (C1/2) angle and cervical alignment (C2-C7) angle after a Magerl and Brooks (M&B) surgical procedure to treat atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, no study has examined an optimum preoperative C1/2 angle reduction. We aimed to assess the relation between the C1/2 angle reduction and the C2-C7 angle change in patients with progressive RA who underwent the M&B procedure.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the relation between the preoperative C1/2 angle and C2-C7 angle in 28 consecutive RA patients using their clinical and radiological data. Differences in the preoperative and postoperative C1/2 and C2-C7 angles were detected. Correlations of these angles and the reduced degree of angles were examined. The Ranawat grading scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to determine myelopathy. Pain was categorized into five categories according to severity. Clinical and X-ray evaluations were collected before surgery, at 3 and/or 6 months after surgery, and at final follow-up.ResultsClinical symptoms, Ranawat grade, and JOA scores improved postoperatively, and patients achieved bony union within 3 months. We observed a strong and significant correlation between the reduced C1/2 angle and the change in the C2-C7 angle. Patients with a preoperative C1/2 angle of <20 degrees had markedly reduced cervical lordotic angle but this condition was not seen in patients with a preoperative C1/2 angle of >or=20 degrees . The optimum C1/2 angle was estimated as [20 degrees - (preoperative C1/2 angle)] in patients with a C1/2 angle <20 degrees or as an in situ angle in patients with a C1/2 angle of >or=20 degrees .ConclusionsSurgeons performing the M&B procedure need to select patients carefully and avoid complete or overreduction of the C1/2 angle to prevent serious postoperative SAS and myelopathy.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.