• Macfarlane Alan J R AJR Department of Anaesthetics, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary. , Kamen Vlassakov, and Nabil Elkassabany.
• Department of Anaesthetics, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary.
• Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct 1; 32 (5): 690-696.

Purpose Of ReviewOutcomes following surgery are of major importance to clinicians, institutions and most importantly patients. This review examines whether regional anesthesia and analgesia influence outcome after vascular surgery.Recent FindingsLarge database analyses of contemporary practice suggest that utilizing regional anesthesia for both open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, lower limb revascularization and carotid endarterectomy reduces morbidity, length of stay and possibly even mortality. Results from such analyses are limited by an inherent risk of bias but are nevertheless important given the number of patients required in randomized trials to detect differences in rare outcomes. There is minimal evidence that regional anesthesia influences longer term outcomes except for arteriovenous fistula surgery where brachial plexus blocks appear to improve 3-month fistula patency.SummaryPatients undergoing vascular surgery often have multiple comorbidities and it is important to be able to outline both benefits and risks of regional anesthesia techniques. Regional anesthesia in vascular surgery allows avoidance of general anesthesia and does provide short-term benefits beyond superior analgesia. Evidence of long-term benefits is lacking in most procedures. Further work is required on newer patient centered outcomes.

27 keywords...

hide…