• Acad Emerg Med · Dec 2019

    Multicenter Study

    Does Shared Decision-Making actually occur in the ED? Looking at it from the patients' perspective.

    • Elizabeth M Schoenfeld, Marc A Probst, Denise D Quigley, St MariePeterP0000-0002-3567-2582Office of Research and the Epidemiology/Biostatistics Research Core, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Bay... more state, Springfield, MA., Nikita Nayyar, Sarah H Sabbagh, Tanesha Beckford, and Hemal K Kanzaria. less
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA.
    • Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 1; 26 (12): 136913781369-1378.

    ObjectiveWe sought to assess the frequency, content, and quality of shared decision making (SDM) in the emergency department (ED), from patients' perspectives.MethodsUtilizing a cross-sectional, multisite approach, we administered an instrument, consisting of two validated SDM assessment tools-the CollaboRATE and the SDM-Q-9-and one newly developed tool to a sample of ED patients. Our primary outcome was the occurrence of SDM in the clinical encounter, as defined by participants giving "top-box" scores on the CollaboRATE measure, and the ability of patients to identify the topic of their SDM conversation. Secondary outcomes included the content of the SDM conversations, as judged by patients, and whether patients were able to complete each of the two validated scales included in the instrument.ResultsAfter exclusions, 285 participants from two sites completed the composite instrument. Just under half identified as female (47%) or as white (47%). Roughly half gave top-box scores (i.e., indicating optimal SDM) on the CollaboRATE scale (49%). Less than half of the participants were able to indicate a decision they were involved in (44%), although those who did gave high scores for such conversations (73/100 via the SDM-Q-9 tool). The most frequently identified decisions discussed were admission versus discharge (19%), medication options (17%), and options for follow-up care (15%).ConclusionsFewer than half of ED patients surveyed reported they were involved in SDM. The most common decision for which SDM was used was around ED disposition (admission vs. discharge). When SDM was employed, patients generally rated the discussion highly.© 2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.