• Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Jul 2001

    Functional assessment of non-heart-beating donor lungs: prediction of post-transplant function.

    • J D Aitchison, H E Orr, P A Flecknell, J A Kirby, and J H Dark.
    • Department of Surgery, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK. j.d.aitchison@ncl.ac.uk
    • Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Jul 1; 20 (1): 187-94.

    ObjectivesTo enable an increase in the numbers of donor lungs using organs from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD). To develop an isolated ventilation and perfusion technique to assess the degree of warm ischaemic organ injury suffered prior to retrieval, thereby enabling identification of lungs with predictably good post-transplant function.MethodsLungs from Landrace-Yorkshire White cross pigs were retrieved after 1 (NHBD(1)), 2 (NHBD(2)) or 4 h (NHBD(4)) post-hypoxic death induced by cessation of ventilation. Control organs were retrieved using standard techniques for each group from matched animals immediately following aortic cross-clamping (Control(1) and combined Control(2,4)). Modified Euro-Collins pulmoplegia was used in all groups, prior to ventilating a single lung with 100% oxygen and perfusion with neutrophil-depleted and deoxygenated blood. For all of the lungs in the NHBD(2) and combined Control(2,4) groups, and one of the successfully perfused NHBD(4), the contralateral lung was then transplanted with post-transplant function assessed for 12 h. All animals were anaesthetized throughout and euthanased without regaining consciousness.ResultsOn assessment, oxygenation after 5 min of perfusion did not differ between NHBD(1) (n=4) vs. Control(1) (n=5; analysis of variance (ANOVA), P=0.152). However, oxygenation had deteriorated significantly in the NHBD(2) group (n=6) vs. Control(2,4) (n=8; ANOVA, P<0.0005) and was significantly poorer than initial values after 8 min (unpaired t-test with Bonferroni correction, P<0.03). In NHBD(4) (n=6), four lungs failed assessment due to the development of gross pulmonary oedema, although the remaining pair functioned as well as Control(2,4). Post-transplantation, NHBD(2) (n=6) contralateral lungs showed significantly poorer overall oxygenation, (mean+/-SD, 46+/-22 kPa) when compared with Control(2,4) (n=6; 59+/-16 kPa; ANOVA, P=0.001), although oxygenation was satisfactory. The contralateral organ from one successfully perfused NHBD(4) lung functioned well post-transplantation.ConclusionsThe significant deterioration in oxygenating performance seen during assessment after 2 h warm ischaemia and the idiosyncratic function after 4 h warm ischaemia indicates the importance of functional testing of NHBD lungs. The similar deterioration in oxygenating performance seen post-transplantation in the contralateral lungs suggests that this method detects functional warm ischaemic lung injury.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…