• N. Engl. J. Med. · Aug 2019

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Myocardial Viability and Long-Term Outcomes in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

    • Julio A Panza, Alicia M Ellis, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, Thomas A Holly, Daniel S Berman, Jae K Oh, Gerald M Pohost, George Sopko, Lukasz Chrzanowski, Daniel B Mark, Tomasz Kukulski, Liliana E Favaloro, Gerald Maurer, Pedro S Farsky, Ru-San Tan, Federico M Asch, Eric J Velazquez, Jean L Rouleau, Kerry L Lee, and Robert O Bonow.
    • From Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla (J.A.P.); Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (A.M.E., H.R.A.-K., D.B.M., K.L.L.); Northwestern University, Chicago (T.A.H., R.O.B.); Cedars Sinai Medical Center (D.S.B.) and the University of Southern California (G.M.P.), Los Angeles; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.K.O.); the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD (G.S.); Medical University of Lodz, Lodz (L.C.), and Medical University of Silesia, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze (T.K.) - both in Poland; University Hospital Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires (L.E.F.); Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (G.M.); Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo (P.S.F.); National Heart Center, Singapore (R.-S.T.); MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC (F.M.A.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (E.J.V.); and Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal (J.L.R.).
    • N. Engl. J. Med. 2019 Aug 22; 381 (8): 739-748.

    BackgroundThe role of assessment of myocardial viability in identifying patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who might benefit from surgical revascularization remains controversial. Furthermore, although improvement in left ventricular function is one of the goals of revascularization, its relationship to subsequent outcomes is unclear.MethodsAmong 601 patients who had coronary artery disease that was amenable to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) and who had a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or lower, we prospectively assessed myocardial viability using single-photon-emission computed tomography, dobutamine echocardiography, or both. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo CABG and receive medical therapy or to receive medical therapy alone. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured at baseline and after 4 months of follow-up in 318 patients. The primary end point was death from any cause. The median duration of follow-up was 10.4 years.ResultsCABG plus medical therapy was associated with a lower incidence of death from any cause than medical therapy alone (182 deaths among 298 patients in the CABG group vs. 209 deaths among 303 patients in the medical-therapy group; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.90). However, no significant interaction was observed between the presence or absence of myocardial viability and the beneficial effect of CABG plus medical therapy over medical therapy alone (P = 0.34 for interaction). An increase in left ventricular ejection fraction was observed only among patients with myocardial viability, irrespective of treatment assignment. There was no association between changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and subsequent death.ConclusionsThe findings of this study do not support the concept that myocardial viability is associated with a long-term benefit of CABG in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The presence of viable myocardium was associated with improvement in left ventricular systolic function, irrespective of treatment, but such improvement was not related to long-term survival. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; STICH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00023595.).Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…