• D L Hogan, K R McQuaid, M A Koss, D L Crombie, S Hunter, C Metz, A R Euler, and J I Isenberg.
• Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego.
• Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 1993 Oct 1; 7 (5): 537-41.

AbstractIt has been proposed that famotidine may be effective in maintaining intragastric pH > or = 4 for up to 12 h with a single i.v. 20 mg bolus injection and thereby prevent acute stress-related mucosal haemorrhage. The present study was designed to compare a ranitidine continuous i.v. infusion (6.25 mg/h) vs. famotidine bolus injection (20 mg every 12 h) on 24-h intragastric pH and gastric acid secretion. Twenty-eight healthy volunteers (15 males, 13 females; 20-56 years) participated in two 24-h treatment periods; each test was in random order separated by 7-10 days. After an overnight fast, subjects were intubated and gastric pH and acid secretion measured hourly. Whereas ranitidine maintained gastric pH above 4 for the entire 24-h period, mean pH steadily decreased to a nadir of 2.9 and 3.7, respectively, 12 h after each famotidine injection (P < 0.01 vs. ranitidine). Furthermore, gastric acid secretion increased to 4.4 +/- 1.2 mmol/h 12 h after famotidine injection compared to 1.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/h with ranitidine (P < 0.01). We conclude that ranitidine delivered as a continuous i.v. infusion (6.25 mg/h) is superior to bolus famotidine injections (20 mg) at 12-h intervals in suppressing gastric acid secretion and maintaining an intragastric pH > or = 4. More frequent famotidine dosing, or delivery by continuous i.v. infusion, may be required to provide prolonged acid suppression.

19 keywords...

hide…