-
Critical care medicine · Apr 2018
Multicenter StudyCulture-Negative Septic Shock Compared With Culture-Positive Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
- Shravan Kethireddy, Beliz Bilgili, Amanda Sees, H Lester Kirchner, Uchenna R Ofoma, R Bruce Light, Yazdan Mirzanejad, Dennis Maki, Aseem Kumar, A Joseph Layon, Joseph E Parrillo, Anand Kumar, and Cooperative Antimicrobial Therapy of Septic Shock (CATSS) Database Research Group.
- The Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA.
- Crit. Care Med. 2018 Apr 1; 46 (4): 506-512.
ObjectivesTo determine the clinical characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative septic shock in comparison with culture-positive septic shock.DesignRetrospective nested cohort study.SettingICUs of 28 academic and community hospitals in three countries between 1997 and 2010.SubjectsPatients with culture-negative septic shock and culture-positive septic shock derived from a trinational (n = 8,670) database of patients with septic shock.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsPatients with culture-negative septic shock (n = 2,651; 30.6%) and culture-positive septic shock (n = 6,019; 69.4%) were identified. Culture-negative septic shock compared with culture-positive septic shock patients experienced similar ICU survival (58.3% vs 59.5%; p = 0.276) and overall hospital survival (47.3% vs 47.1%; p = 0.976). Severity of illness was similar between culture-negative septic shock and culture-positive septic shock groups ([mean and SD Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, 25.7 ± 8.3 vs 25.7 ± 8.1]; p = 0.723) as were serum lactate levels (3.0 [interquartile range, 1.7-6.1] vs 3.2 mmol/L [interquartile range, 1.8-5.9 mmol/L]; p = 0.366). As delays in the administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy after the onset of hypotension increased, patients in both groups experienced congruent increases in overall hospital mortality: culture-negative septic shock (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI [1.47-1.66]; p < 0.0001) and culture-positive septic shock (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI [1.59-1.71]; p < 0.0001).ConclusionsPatients with culture-negative septic shock behave similarly to those with culture-positive septic shock in nearly all respects; early appropriate antimicrobial therapy appears to improve mortality. Early recognition and eradication of infection is the most obvious effective strategy to improve hospital survival.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.