• Spine J · Aug 2017

    Is a gradual reduction of stiffness on top of posterior instrumentation possible with a suitable proximal implant? A biomechanical study.

    • Tobias Lange, Werner Schmoelz, Georg Gosheger, Martin Eichinger, Christian H Heinrichs, Boevingloh Albert Schulze AS Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Münster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany., and Tobias L Schulte.
    • Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Münster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Münster, Germany. Electronic address: tobias.lange@ukmuenster.de.
    • Spine J. 2017 Aug 1; 17 (8): 1148-1155.

    Background ContextProximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a challenging complication after rigid posterior instrumentation (RI) of the spine. Several risk factors have been described in literature so far, including the rigidity of the cranial aspect of the implant.PurposeThe aim of this biomechanical study was to compare different proximal implants designed to gradually reduce the stiffness between the instrumented and non-instrumented spine.Study Design/SettingThis is a biomechanical study.MethodsEight calf lumbar spines (L2-L6) underwent RI with a titanium pedicle screw rod construct at L4-L6. The proximal transition segment (L3-L4) was instrumented stepwise with different supplementary implants-spinal bands (SB), cerclage wires (CW), hybrid rods (HR), hinged pedicle screws (HPS), or lamina hooks (LH)-and compared with an all-pedicle screw construct (APS). The flexibility of each segment (L2-L6) was tested with pure moments of ±10.0 Nm in the native state and for each implant at L3-L4, and the segmental range of motion (ROM) was evaluated.ResultsOn flexion and extension, the native uninstrumented L3-L4 segment showed a mean ROM of 7.3°. The CW reduced the mean ROM to 42.5%, SB to 41.1%, HR to 13.7%, HPS to 12.3%, LH to 6.8%, and APS to 12.3%. On lateral bending, the native segment L3-L4 showed a mean ROM of 15°. The CW reduced the mean ROM to 58.0%, SB to 78.0%, HR to 6.7%, HPS to 6.7%, LH to 10.0%, and APS to 3.3%. On axial rotation, the uninstrumented L3-L4 segment showed a mean ROM of 2.7°. The CW reduced the mean ROM to 55.6%, SB to 77.8%, HR to 55.6%, HPS to 55.6%, LH to 29.6%, and APS to 37.0%.ConclusionsUsing CW or SB at the proximal transition segment of a long RI reduced rigidity by about 60% in relation to flexion and extension in that segment, whereas the other implants tested had a high degree of rigidity comparable with APS. Clinical randomized controlled trials are needed to elucidate whether this strategy might be effective for preventing PJK.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.