• World Neurosurg · Jan 2020

    A new diagnostic medium for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Dynamic somatosensory evoked potentials.

    • Qihua Qi, Huang Sheng S Department of Orthopedic, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China., Zemin Ling, Yan Chen, Hao Hu, Ping Zhan, Bin Zhang, Xuenong Zou, and Xinsheng Peng.
    • Department of Orthopedic, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
    • World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 1; 133: e225-e232.

    ObjectiveTo identify and reveal the sensitivity and efficiency of dynamic somatosensory evoked potentials (DSSEPs) in the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).MethodsThis retrospective study included 31 CSM and 15 control patients. All patients received SSEP examination with stimulation of median and ulnar nerves at neutral, flexed, and extended cervical positions; latency and amplitude were recorded at the C2 and C5 spinous processes and in the scalp over the primary sensory area (C3'/4'). The percentage changes in latency and amplitude with dynamic motion were examined for each lead and compared between groups; the diagnostic cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.ResultsAll the patients with CSM received surgeries and were followed up for 1 year. Amplitude parameters varied with a dynamic position in both groups; all recorded dynamic SSEP indices except right median stimulus recorded at C5 spinous process, right ulnar stimulus recorded at scalp point C3, and right ulnar stimulus recorded at C2 spinous process were significantly different between groups (P < 0.05), but latency was not (P > 0.05). At the neutral position, the amplitude of left media stimulus recorded at C2 spinous process (LMC2) was associated with CSM, but with low diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.199). At a dynamic position, the percentage change in amplitude of LMC2 and of left ulnar stimulus recorded at C2 spinous process (LUC2) were determined to be diagnostic of CSM (P < 0.05), with areas under the curve of 0.891 and 0.912, respectively. Both records had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of CSM; the diagnostic cutoff values of LMC2 and LUC2 were calculated as 10.2% and 19.25%, respectively.ConclusionsThe percentage change in amplitude was obvious during cervical dynamic motion, with records from LMC2 and LUC2 being predictive of CSM diagnosis; dynamic SSEPs provided a simple, accurate, and noninvasive supplementary test for the diagnosis of complicated CSM.Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.