• Spine · Feb 2020

    How Does Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Progress in Conservatively Managed Patients?

    • Sehan Park, Dong-Ho Lee, Joosuk Ahn, Jae Hwan Cho, Suk Kyu Lee, Kook-Jong Kim, Jae Hong Park, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Woo Park, and Choon Sung Lee.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    • Spine. 2020 Feb 15; 45 (4): 234-243.

    Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to elucidate the progression of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in conservatively managed patients and determine its risk factors SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Although several studies have demonstrated how OPLL progresses after laminoplasty or fusion, its progression in conservatively managed patients remains unclear.MethodsThe vertical length of the ossified mass and its thickness at each segment were evaluated on sagittal computed tomography images. Patients with vertical growth >2 mm were included in the vertical progression group. Segments with a thickness progression >1 mm were classified as thickness progressed segments, and patients who had at least one progressed segment were included in the thickness progression group. Based on the characteristics at each disc level, the ossified mass at each segment was classified into four types: type 1, no disc space involvement; type 2, involving the disc space, but not crossing; type 3, crossing the disc space, but not fused; and type 4, completely fused.ResultsThe progression of ossified mass was observed in younger patients (P < 0.01) and in C2-C3 involvement (P < 0.01) cases. Moreover, progression in both directions was observed more frequently in the mixed-type OPLL (P < 0.01). Progression occurred most often in type 3 segments (72.0%, P < 0.01). In type 3 segments, thickness progression was found more frequently in segments with segmental range of motion (ROM) ≥5° (55.6% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.04). The proportion of segments whose initial thickness was >5 mm was significantly higher among progressed segments (60.0% vs. 35.2%, P = 0.03).ConclusionYoung age, C2-C3 involvement, and mixed-type OPLL are risk factors for OPLL progression. Segments with morphology of crossing the segment, but without fusion (type 3), segmental ROM ≥5°, and initial thickness >5 mm need special attention.Level Of Evidence3.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.