• C Kunz, H Hofmann, A Moritz, H Bachmayer, and E Liehl.
• Infection. 1978 Jan 1; 6 (5): 217-20.

AbstractThe antibody response to a new influenza subunit vaccine was compare d one year after vaccination with the responses induced by two other influenza vaccines. The subunit vaccine was given either in a high dose form containing 2100 IU, or in a low dose form containing 700 IU. As comparison a split vaccine was used containing 800 IU and AI(OH)3 as adjuvant and a whole virus vaccine containing 2100 IU. Of the 399 vaccinated subjects which had taken part in this study 151 were available for hemagglutination inhibiting (HAI) antibody determinations one year after vaccination. Protection rates assessed for the respective groups on the assumption that serum HAI titers of 1 : 32 or greater confer protection. With the high dose of subunit vaccine 85% of volunteers were considered still to have protective titers one year after vaccination, compared with 77% of those who received the whole virus vaccine. Although the high dose subunit vaccine and whole virus vaccine induced similarly high protective levels lasting at least one year, the reactions observed on vaccination were significantly less with the subunit preparation. The lower dose of subunit vaccine induced lower levels of protection (60%) after one year, and lower mean HAI titers than the high dose subunit vaccine. Nevertheless protection was superior to that of the split virus adjuvant vaccine. The addition of adjuvant thus does not seem materially to improve the immune response to influenza virus antigens. An increase of antigen content can however be seen as a practical alternative for achieving higher antibody levels. The subunit vaccine would appear to be particularly suitable in this respect as even with a higher dose there is no increase in reactogenicity.

19 keywords...

hide…