• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Jan 1990

    Comparative Study

    Comparison between straight- and curved-stem Müller femoral prostheses. 5- to 10-year results of 545 total hip replacements.

    • J Wilson-MacDonald and E Morscher.
    • Department of Surgery, University of Basel, Switzerland.
    • Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1990 Jan 1; 109 (1): 14-20.

    AbstractBetween 1977 and 1982, 545 cemented femoral prostheses were implanted, in combination with a noncoated cementless polyethylene acetabular component (RM cup). Three hundred and eighty-one straight-stem and 76 curved-stem Müller femoral components were implanted, as well as 88 collared components with a 130-mm stem and a 130 degrees neck-shaft angle, derived from a long-stem steel prosthesis. Survivorship analysis of revisions for aseptic loosening at 10 years revealed 97% straight-stem survival, 91.6% curved-stem survival, and 88.3% 130 degrees stem survival. "Survival" curves were also constructed for radiological loosening, and the survival rates (patients without radiological evidence of loosening) were 69.8%, 78.8%, and 63.1% respectively at 10 years. The 130 degrees collared stem was associated with significantly less acetabular loosening than the other prostheses. This resulted in less calcar resorption, but there was a higher rate of stem loosening. Acetabular loosening and associated wear products appear to be responsible for calcar resorption, and stress shielding of the calcar appears to be of minor importance in the pathogenesis of aseptic stem loosening. Better cementing techniques have improved survivorship of the curved-stem prosthesis, and early fears of high rates of radiological loosening with the straight stem have not been substantiated.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…