-
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Jan 1991
Comparative StudyUncoated polyethylene RM acetabular component versus Müller cemented acetabular component. A 4- to 8-year follow-up study.
- M Krismer, M Fischer, T Klestil, and B Frischhut.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Clinic of Innsbruck, Austria.
- Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991 Jan 1; 110 (4): 195-9.
AbstractComparable patient populations with 160 uncoated RM acetabular cups and 263 cemented Müller standard acetabular cups were submitted to survival-time analysis in a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years for the RM cup and 6.1 years for the Müller cup. After 7-8 years 12% of the RM cups and 4% of the Müller cups had been exchanged, 40% and 15% respectively were loose. The poor performance of the RM cups is ascribed to additional external polyethylene wear, which leads to the formation of granulomas and destroys the weight-bearing osseous structures. Similar granulomas also develop on the proximal stem and thus endanger the same.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.